The following methods have been identified from professional experience and from detailed returns by several parliamentary research services. The original list of 40 items used in the ongoing survey is being added to. (They are marked ‘new’ in the list below)
Further information, including results from the survey, will be added progressively, including pages on particular methods.
- Intranet site/pages dedicated to the research service
- External website/pages dedicated to the research service [UK – House of Commons library & research service]
- Social media (Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok etc) [List of parliamentary library & research services & people on Twitter ; A blog on WordPress by a specialist research service for European Parliament committees ]
- Promotional emails – newsletters, adverts etc
- Promotional videos [European Parliamentary Research Service YouTube channel ; The history of POST (UK)].
- Promotional audio clips, podcasts [European Parliamentary Research Service podcasts]
- Promotional gadgets, clothing, bags etc
- Research products published/accessible externally [Ghana – research papers ; Knesset – research papers translated into English ; New Zealand ]
- Press releases and/or actively generating coverage in mainstream media
- Permanent displays of hard-copy research reports
- Special Products – e.g. condensed research reports [example from the European Parliament]
- Special publication with an overview of policy issues for a newly-elected parliament [example from the UK parliament, also available as a video with sign language]
- Publishes practical guide(s) for Members on how parliament works
- Branding on all research products
- Common visual identity for all products and promotional materials – same ‘look and feel’
- Presentation of services to groups of Members
- Presentation of the service in Committee meetings
- Presentation of the service to Members individually, interviews with Members
- Presentation of the service to party (research) staff [New]
- Account managers designated for relations with individual Members. [New] [There is a post about the ‘account manager’ concept – in general, not about the New Zealand case – here].
- ‘Floorwalking’ to meet Members and their staff. [New]
- Social events on service premises (‘morning tea’) to encourage contact with Members’ staff [New]
- Training/induction for Members in how to use the research service, benefits of research
- Training/induction for staff of Members in how to use the research service, benefits of research
- Physical presence of service where Members gather (e.g. desk in a lounge area)
- Knowledge-based events (seminars, conferences, workshops etc) around research themes
- ‘Open Day’ or ‘Research week’ events
- Personal meeting with Member when they request research
- Request for feedback by form when research is delivered to a Member
- Propose in-person discussion to get feedback when research is delivered to a Member
- Presence of research staff in Committee meetings
- Workshops with Committee Members or their staff to identify research priorities
- Formal Committee decisions on research topics
- Relevant research products proactively circulated to Committee Members
- Surveys of Members
- ‘Focus group’ meetings to discover client views of the service [New]
- Publication of performance data for the research service
- Publication of service standards for the research service or ‘Service Charter’ or ‘rules’ of the service
- Advisory board with Members [UK – the Board of POST] or similar advisory body [The ‘evidence caucus in Kenya]
- External engagement/publication by staff research experts
- International cooperation with other research services, engagement with international professional bodies [For example, at the global level, IFLAPARL]
- Provides parliamentary strengthening support to other parliaments
- Engagement of the service with wider research & professional networks
- Engagement in general inter-parliamentary activities, IPU events etc
- Internships for young people offered in the research service
2 thoughts on “Raising the profile of a parliamentary research service – a checklist of methods”